Course Description

This course will investigate the ways in which artists have presented narratives in the public realm and the organizations that have made the presentation of those works central to their curatorial practices over the last 40 years. Focusing on recent works presented in New York’s public spaces by Creative Time, The Public Art Fund, the Percent for Art Program, Arts for Transit and other non-profits organizations, this course will look at what it meant to tell stories and open discourses that challenged or interrogated widely-held value systems, the events and the politics of their time. In addition to the specifics of current and other key works and projects, we will discuss the conditions that governed the development of public performance, temporary and permanent installations, the ways in which those works were influenced by public approval processes and governmental agencies, media coverage and community response. Each student’s final project will be an on-line proposal for an exhibition that conveys a “narrative“ developed in the context of this course, referencing other relevant works .

Tuesday, September 29, 2015

Thinking about the Public in Public Art 
by Tom Eccles and Tom Finkelpearl with Ann Pasternak

               According to the conversation between Eccles and Finkelpearl, during towards the 90s, the Percent for Art program had more artists who were of color. Art is a barrier breaker that does not discriminate but the exhibitions themselves are judged by people who do not necessarily understand the concept of using art as a bridge into other cultures: "For example, working with a Japanese-American artist in Chinatown or a Puerto Rican artist in Dominican Washington Heights is a bridge-building exercise versus whether it's an Asian artist in an Asian community and a Latino artist in a Latino community."


               Finkelpearl argues that the problem was meant to create diverse art in the diverse cultural mixture of New York. By introducing arts not native to a certain community, it required the audience to take a step forward and accept the art as being unfamiliar. The artists are expected to pull the audience into their work; by having the community interact with the process, the product is not just a classified piece belonging to a X artist from X country, it becomes a public piece that belongs to the community. 

Posted by Patrick Chen

No comments:

Post a Comment