Course Description

This course will investigate the ways in which artists have presented narratives in the public realm and the organizations that have made the presentation of those works central to their curatorial practices over the last 40 years. Focusing on recent works presented in New York’s public spaces by Creative Time, The Public Art Fund, the Percent for Art Program, Arts for Transit and other non-profits organizations, this course will look at what it meant to tell stories and open discourses that challenged or interrogated widely-held value systems, the events and the politics of their time. In addition to the specifics of current and other key works and projects, we will discuss the conditions that governed the development of public performance, temporary and permanent installations, the ways in which those works were influenced by public approval processes and governmental agencies, media coverage and community response. Each student’s final project will be an on-line proposal for an exhibition that conveys a “narrative“ developed in the context of this course, referencing other relevant works .

Tuesday, September 29, 2015

Response to Public Art

Page 86
Eccles:

  • Mayor Dinkins was a supporter of art, but Mayor Giuliani’s not. Having an administration that was unsupportive(uninterested) was in hindsight a major source of success in freeing artists from the political process 
  • traditional public spaces, and parks are managed by private spaces - run and maintained by private organization, ie. Central Park Conservancy, the Madison Square Park Conservancy and the Bryant Park Restoration and Development Corporation (primary partners)
  • rejects the idea that a park has a “message” or “brand”

  • debunks the notion that art stood for something other than itself
    it’s about individual not communal
Pasternak:
  • Creative Time: to develop projects with artists that would free them from city constraints and avoid bureaucratic obstacles. (work extra hard to have access to the public spaces that they want to use)
  • Percent for Art: officially mandated to work within the public spaces

Finklepearl:
  • John Ahearn’s Bronx Bronze
    • He’s a white resident of the South Bronx, was known both in the his neighborhood and in the art world for his painted bronze sculptures depicting local residents in a vibrant and positive fashion--using a medium traditionally reserved for heroes and allegorical figures to depict everyday people. 
    • Ahearn created casts of local residents--a young girl on roller skates and two boys, one alone, another with his dog--for the commission. Some community members said sculptures represented a side of their neighborhood that they did not want presented--especially in their highly prominent location along the Grand Concourse, a main Bronx thoroughfare for residents, tourists and outsiders visiting Yankee Stadium.
    • The youth depicted in the sculptures were idle--hanging out on the street--and, some felt, intimidating, even reminiscent of drug dealers and hustlers from the neighborhood. Essentially, people think he is racist. 



  • Bob Rivera’s sculpture Open Voyage
    • Bob Rivera's Open Voyage is a colorful, abstract work located on the roof of the gymnasium at P.S. 279. The sculpture is framed out of pieces of aluminum bolted together. 
    • An aluminum skeletal structure provides support at the back, as do brightly-colored diagonal aluminum poles which help distribute weight.


  • Percent for Art (publicly funded, governmental public art entity, is a good place to seek a more collective voice. 

No comments:

Post a Comment