Course Description

This course will investigate the ways in which artists have presented narratives in the public realm and the organizations that have made the presentation of those works central to their curatorial practices over the last 40 years. Focusing on recent works presented in New York’s public spaces by Creative Time, The Public Art Fund, the Percent for Art Program, Arts for Transit and other non-profits organizations, this course will look at what it meant to tell stories and open discourses that challenged or interrogated widely-held value systems, the events and the politics of their time. In addition to the specifics of current and other key works and projects, we will discuss the conditions that governed the development of public performance, temporary and permanent installations, the ways in which those works were influenced by public approval processes and governmental agencies, media coverage and community response. Each student’s final project will be an on-line proposal for an exhibition that conveys a “narrative“ developed in the context of this course, referencing other relevant works .

Monday, September 28, 2015

MTA Artworks

Delancey Street

The experience of seeing an outdoor landscape within an underground subway station is surreal. The illusion of there being something natural within an environment that is meant to be fast paced is almost odd but curious as it pops out to the passerby. It almost wants to say we are a traveler, exploring the world of a subway just as one would in the openness of a grove of trees, eager to wander and see what hidden sights lie beyond the redundant elements.

The feeling of depth further reinforces the idea of an illusion with further cements the boundary of the world we see this landscape from to a point of view from inside the landscape looking at us. Both perspectives are curious and bizarre.

MING FAY
Shad Crossing, Delancey Orchard, 2004
Glass mosaics on platform and mezzanine walls

Broadway-Lafayette

In a world where we constantly look down at our mobile devices, it proves the span of our awareness is limited. Signal is like a stranger that greets us as we walk by, lighting up, unwilling to be invisible to us as we would normally pass it by without even a single glance. Despite it being just a stationary piece, the lights take us by surprise as we look down at the curious designs that seem to pique at our human curiosity. 

When not lit, it looks like a cobweb, formed over time as we constantly lose our surroundings. It becomes invisible, unworthy of our attention. 

MEL CHIN
Signal, 1997
Stainless steel and glass sculpture with lights on mezzanine column bases; ceramic tile on station walls


 Astor Place

A reminder of the past of America with the use of trade in beaver fur, tying with the history of Astor Place itself.


HEINS & lAFARGE / GRUEBY FALENCE COMPANY
1904
FALENCE PLAQUE WITH BEAVER

What is it? A series of seemingly bold colored squares that look like quilt patterns. Their purpose seems to provoke our nature to find an order within a chaotic environment. Frustration hits us as we drift into deep thought, overthinking something that merely had a simple explanation. Why make something so simple and not complex to tease our minds?

The constant variability of what we see is vague; is it a flower? Is it a baseball diamond? There is no answer.

MILTON GLASER
Untitled, 1986
Porcelain enamel on platform walls
Posted by Patrick Chen

No comments:

Post a Comment